Indian cricketer Mohammad Shami a can’t call criminal for skipping roza
Indian Muslims should have complete freedom to practice their religion without any pressure or coercion. Recently, a controversy erupted over Indian cricketer Mohammad Shami when some clerics criticized him for not observing Roza (fasting). But can Ulema or anyone else decide on an individual’s religious conduct?
Personal Faith and Religious Freedom
Fasting during Ramadan is considered an important act of worship in Islam, but it is also clear that Islam does not support coercion. The Quran states, “There is no compulsion in religion” (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:256). Despite this, some radical clerics often try to impose their interpretations on others.
For professional athletes like Mohammad Shami, fasting depends on their physical capacity and career requirements. Many Muslim players in the sports world refrain from fasting to ensure that their performance is not affected. Does this make them any less religious?
Role and Limitations of Religious Leaders
The role of Ulema is to provide religious guidance, not to judge someone’s personal faith. When clerics label an individual as guilty or immoral simply because they do not meet certain religious standards, it becomes an example of religious extremism.
In a democratic country like India, every individual has the right to practice their faith and traditions as they choose. It is time for Indian Muslims to free themselves from religious pressure and live by their own conscience. Religious leaders may offer advice, but they do not have the right to impose their opinions or pass judgment.
Conclusion
Muslims must recognize that religion is a matter of personal faith and cannot be forced upon anyone. In India, every person should have the freedom to practice their beliefs in their own way—whether they observe Roza or not. Clerics and Ulema must respect this right and refrain from imposing their views on others.
- Religion World Bureau
